- #SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK WINDOWS 10#
- #SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK PRO#
- #SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK TRIAL#
- #SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK DOWNLOAD#
Of course, i spoke to a guru at length, and he said my question in that topic was well put and a very fair question to ask.īack to mute.
#SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK WINDOWS 10#
Just like your answers in my motherboard topic, where you didn't understand about the mmcss going to kernel level in windows 10 and being limited to 32 logical cores, so attacked my intelligence instead as a reply. Nope, it was just an instant go at trying to correct me, um, incorrectly by the way. Why on earth did i even bother to unmute and view the post, just in case, after weeks of muting, you had written something useful. I'll take propellerheads' word on it over yours thanks very much. You could rewire reaper, ableton, numerology, etc into the rewire master, and all would compound and stack onto one core, including whatever plugins you use inside them. Its ONLY job is get something from point "a" to point "b".ĪLL the processing done through the rewire stream is stacked onto one core. It does not make sense to say if its "single or multi threaded". Reaper is basically free if you don't mind a nag window. I did this for years by hosting VI's in Reaper and Rewiring them into PT from the instruments individual outputs.
#SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK PRO#
PPS i suppose VEP is the answer for doing it fully integrated on the same machine, i saw a video with pro tools expert adding spectrasonics stuff to ve pro and it's not impacting pro tools performance at all.īut that's not a cheap program. and i could compensate with pro tools record offset very easily, as of course that won't be sample accurate.īut i really want to sell the imac and have only one desktop. i'd just get a standalone program like patchwork and put it at ultra low buffer, and use a cheap multi channel interface going into the Apollo. PS if i get a new computer and keep my imac, yes it will be easy to do it with a second machine.
#SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK DOWNLOAD#
you download it and HAVE to pay the $39 for outputs.
#SOUND SIPHON VS LOOPBACK TRIAL#
Sound siphon is commercial ware, unfortunately, and it has high ratings, but the free trial is a scam, there is no such thing. I found sound siphon and loopback as suggested, and will see if i can create aggregate devices so that the virtual input is always on, and i'll assign my interface output to the aggregate. Yeah, for same computer, rewire won't work i don't think. I also don't know of a daw on mac that can host vst/au plugins when in rewire slave mode. so at most, i might get one or two kontakt pads out of it. Unfortunately rewire can not use more than one core, propellerheads confirmed this, it was never designed to multi thread. I'd be interested in seeing if it's possible to do all on one computer too. I'm able to accomplish what you're trying to do with another computer and interface by routing the audio back into Pro Tools via ADAT. Well this is really what Rewire is designed to do, but I don't know that it works with Kontakt. PS would really like to do this, so anyone who is using standalone VI's of any kind, please let me know how you get it into Pro tools. Is there a soundflower alternative, and a straightforward workflow to this? where i can still monitor through my interface, but the output of the stand alone synth to whatever inter app virtual audio cable and perhaps add the input of that virtual audio cable to a new aggregate IO that pro tools can use?ĭo aggregate audio devices have performance penalties?Ĭheers. It's trickier in PT, as PT only allows one interface, you can not change nterfaces between inputs and outputs.
In the past, i would think soundflower could do it, but i downloaded the sierra one and i can't see any possible way to assign inputs and outputs to it. Problem is getting the sound into PT as audio. I am really able to make so much more out of the same cpu.
But doing this, it allows me to add a bunch more kontakt instruments, and uses cpu space outside pro tools!
I already have a maxed out PT project, or close to. I have been mucking around with kontakt stand alone.Īnd basically what happens is, if i assign midi tracks in pro tools to kontakt's virtual midi (i believe this is only on mac kontakt), and set kontakt at 32 samples.
0 kommentar(er)
